Union Health Ministry Flags Hexavalent Vaccine for Universal Immunisation Programme

|

Union Health Ministry Flags Hexavalent Vaccine for Universal Immunisation Programme

Science & Technology
Union Health Ministry Flags Hexavalent Vaccine for Universal Immunisation Programme

A study by the Union Health Ministry and partner organisations flags introducing a hexavalent vaccine under the Universal Immunisation Programme as a measure that reduces the number of injections for infants. The study presents efficiency, cost, and implementation scenario findings related to replacing existing vaccine schedules with a single six-in-one injection.

Hexavalent Vaccine under Universal Immunisation Programme:

Dimension Key Details
Vaccine type A hexavalent (six-in-one) vaccine comprises a combination vaccine administered as a single injection for infants.
Disease coverage The hexavalent vaccine comprises protection against: diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (whooping cough), Hepatitis B, Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), and polio.
Efficiency finding It is for an assessment of operational efficiency, including reduction in injections, time savings, and easing of frontline worker pressure.
Cost finding The study provides for a finding that a 50% price reduction makes system-level savings outweigh higher procurement costs.
Operational impact finding The study provides for impacts including fewer injections for infants, reduced caregiver burden, lower cold-chain requirements, and easier delivery for health workers.
Implementation scenarios Scenarios: Primary schedule replaces pentavalent plus fractional IPV with hexavalent; Booster replaces the primary schedule plus DTP booster with a hexavalent booster.
Did you find this informative?

Attempt Possible Qs

Q 1 / 2

With reference to the operational impact findings of introducing a hexavalent vaccine, consider the following statements:
1. It leads to fewer injections for infants.
2. It reduces caregiver burden.
3. It increases cold-chain requirements.
Which of the statements given above are correct?